Book Review The Economic Sociology of Capitalism
نویسنده
چکیده
Comparative economists have gradually concluded that success or failure in transition to democratic capitalism is a matter of institutions, not geography or leadership or outside assistance. However, why do some countries exhibit pro-growth institutions, with little corruption or rent seeking? And how can we explain the relative successes of very different forms of capitalism, such as the USA, the Netherlands, Ireland, or mid-20th century Japan? A group of sociologists, intellectual descendants of Neil Smelser and Robert Merton, present some indirect answers in this volume. Dissatisfied with Douglass North's initial conception of institutions as disembodied rules (including incentives) which will yield efficient outcomes, they propose a concept of social structure (networks) through which actors pursue their interests, sometimes erroneously, but need not attain an efficient income (p. 56). New institutions are not simply reactions by the state to a changed environment; and old organisations resist change unless and until conflict forces them to adapt. Furthermore, North and others are criticised for emphasising growth alone as the metric of development, since that narrow goal will inevitably favour the power of capitalists. Rather, Amartya Sen's capability approach – people leading lives 'they value y and have reason to value' – requires broad democratic deliberation on optimal social choices. Another paradigm for institutional analysis is recommended by Avner Greif, who wrote an introduction to this book. Greif believes that game theory allows economists to insert considerations of beliefs, information, and interaction into an empirical account, as he has done elsewhere for the Mediterranean traders of the Middle Ages. For Greif institutions are 'social factors' which impose themselves on individuals and generate a regularity of behaviour, reinforced by repeated transactions. This compendium contains several applied contributions of special interest to comparative economists. According to Victor Nee, economists who advocated a shock therapy for ex-socialist economies thought they could impose a new set of rules or institutions, but this gambit was ineffectual because it ignored the 'realities of power and interests in institutional
منابع مشابه
The Economic Sociology of Capitalism: An Introduction and Agenda
Edited by Victor Nee & Richard Swedberg: The Economic Sociology of Capitalism is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, © 2005, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from t...
متن کاملeconomic sociology _ the european electronic newsletter 9
Dear reader, In the last two issues we have turned to adjacent fields and looked at anthropology and economics. In this issue we zoom in on geography. From this glance we suggest that at least these three disciplines are getting increasingly " sociological ". Sociological ideas, theories, concepts, and ways of reasoning are being used also outside of sociology. We also argue that sociologists c...
متن کاملOral Criticism/A Review of the Book of Cultural Discourses and Iranian Art Trends: A Study in the Sociology of Contemporary Iranian Painting/ Mohammad Reza Moridi, Parisa Shadghazvini, and Behnam Kamrani
متن کامل
The Economic Sociology of Capitalism Weber and Schumpeter
This article points to a distinct puzzle in the analyses of capitalism that can be found in the works of Weber and Schumpeter, and gives a new introduction to their analysis of capitalism. Both Weber and Schumpeter wrote voluminously on capitalism, as testified to by such giant works as Economy and Society (Weber, 1978c [1922]) and Business Cycles (Schumpeter, 1939). One can also discern a dist...
متن کاملA Critique of the “Varieties of Capitalism” Approach
The objective of this paper is to critically review the so-called “varieties of capitalism” (VoC) approach. This is a meaningful exercise given the popularity of the VoC approach across wide ranging disciplines, from political economy to economic sociology to management studies, and especially taking into consideration, the recent show of interest in the approach by the writers of corporate soc...
متن کاملMPIfG Discussion Paper 12/4 Capitalism as a System of Contingent Expectations Toward a Sociological Microfoundation of Political Economy
Political economy and economic sociology have developed in relative isolation from each other. While political economy focuses largely on macrophenomena, economic sociology focuses on the level of social interaction in the economy. The paper argues that economic sociology can provide a microfoundation of political economy beyond rational actor theory and behavioral economics. Based on a discuss...
متن کامل